Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.
Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.