Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Section 88(3) of the GST enactments makes directors of a private company in liquidation jointly and severally liable for unrecovered tax dues incurred during their tenure, unless they establish before the Commissioner that non-recovery was not caused by their gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The notes state that a director's later retirement from an associated partnership does not by itself prevent recovery from that firm's accounts where the person was a partner during the default period. They also address recovery from related entities: interchanged family management and formation of a subsequent company to avoid arrears may justify examination of whether the corporate veil should be lifted.
Section 88(3) of the GST enactments makes directors of a private company in liquidation jointly and severally liable for unrecovered tax dues incurred during their tenure, unless they establish before the Commissioner that non-recovery was not caused by their gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The notes state that a director's later retirement from an associated partnership does not by itself prevent recovery from that firm's accounts where the person was a partner during the default period. They also address recovery from related entities: interchanged family management and formation of a subsequent company to avoid arrears may justify examination of whether the corporate veil should be lifted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.