<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director liability for unrecovered GST dues may extend to associated firms and related entities through corporate veil lifting.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101962</link>
    <description>Section 88(3) of the GST enactments makes directors of a private company in liquidation jointly and severally liable for unrecovered tax dues incurred during their tenure, unless they establish before the Commissioner that non-recovery was not caused by their gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The notes state that a director&#039;s later retirement from an associated partnership does not by itself prevent recovery from that firm&#039;s accounts where the person was a partner during the default period. They also address recovery from related entities: interchanged family management and formation of a subsequent company to avoid arrears may justify examination of whether the corporate veil should be lifted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:39:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:39:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director liability for unrecovered GST dues may extend to associated firms and related entities through corporate veil lifting.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101962</link>
      <description>Section 88(3) of the GST enactments makes directors of a private company in liquidation jointly and severally liable for unrecovered tax dues incurred during their tenure, unless they establish before the Commissioner that non-recovery was not caused by their gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The notes state that a director&#039;s later retirement from an associated partnership does not by itself prevent recovery from that firm&#039;s accounts where the person was a partner during the default period. They also address recovery from related entities: interchanged family management and formation of a subsequent company to avoid arrears may justify examination of whether the corporate veil should be lifted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:39:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>