Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3261 to 3280 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A notice under section 143(2) issued by the officer who completes a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) is presented as a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. The notes state that where one officer issued the statutory notice but another completed the assessment without issuing a fresh notice, the assessment has an inherent jurisdictional defect rather than a curable procedural irregularity. Relying on the stated Delhi High Court and Supreme Court positions, the text explains that such an assessment is invalid, consequential proceedings are non est, and other grounds become academic.
A notice under section 143(2) issued by the officer who completes a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) is presented as a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. The notes state that where one officer issued the statutory notice but another completed the assessment without issuing a fresh notice, the assessment has an inherent jurisdictional defect rather than a curable procedural irregularity. Relying on the stated Delhi High Court and Supreme Court positions, the text explains that such an assessment is invalid, consequential proceedings are non est, and other grounds become academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
