<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory scrutiny notice by the assessing officer is essential; assessment without it is jurisdictionally invalid and consequential proceedings fail.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101938</link>
    <description>A notice under section 143(2) issued by the officer who completes a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) is presented as a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. The notes state that where one officer issued the statutory notice but another completed the assessment without issuing a fresh notice, the assessment has an inherent jurisdictional defect rather than a curable procedural irregularity. Relying on the stated Delhi High Court and Supreme Court positions, the text explains that such an assessment is invalid, consequential proceedings are non est, and other grounds become academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory scrutiny notice by the assessing officer is essential; assessment without it is jurisdictionally invalid and consequential proceedings fail.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101938</link>
      <description>A notice under section 143(2) issued by the officer who completes a scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) is presented as a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. The notes state that where one officer issued the statutory notice but another completed the assessment without issuing a fresh notice, the assessment has an inherent jurisdictional defect rather than a curable procedural irregularity. Relying on the stated Delhi High Court and Supreme Court positions, the text explains that such an assessment is invalid, consequential proceedings are non est, and other grounds become academic.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>