Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose either the NAV or DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares. Where the NAV method is selected and the audited-financial-statement computation is not disputed, income-tax authorities may scrutinise the valuation only within that method and cannot substitute another approach; a share-premium addition based on rejecting the NAV valuation is therefore unsustainable. Income-tax authorities cannot sustain such an addition by determining alleged FEMA contraventions, particularly where no competent FEMA authority has alleged a violation. A right-share issue is not a colourable device without a demonstrated tax benefit or unaccounted-money element. The share-premium addition was directed to be deleted.
Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose either the NAV or DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares. Where the NAV method is selected and the audited-financial-statement computation is not disputed, income-tax authorities may scrutinise the valuation only within that method and cannot substitute another approach; a share-premium addition based on rejecting the NAV valuation is therefore unsustainable. Income-tax authorities cannot sustain such an addition by determining alleged FEMA contraventions, particularly where no competent FEMA authority has alleged a violation. A right-share issue is not a colourable device without a demonstrated tax benefit or unaccounted-money element. The share-premium addition was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.