<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee-selected NAV valuation method limits tax scrutiny; share-premium addition cannot rest on alternative valuation or alleged FEMA breaches.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101934</link>
    <description>Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose either the NAV or DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares. Where the NAV method is selected and the audited-financial-statement computation is not disputed, income-tax authorities may scrutinise the valuation only within that method and cannot substitute another approach; a share-premium addition based on rejecting the NAV valuation is therefore unsustainable. Income-tax authorities cannot sustain such an addition by determining alleged FEMA contraventions, particularly where no competent FEMA authority has alleged a violation. A right-share issue is not a colourable device without a demonstrated tax benefit or unaccounted-money element. The share-premium addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee-selected NAV valuation method limits tax scrutiny; share-premium addition cannot rest on alternative valuation or alleged FEMA breaches.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101934</link>
      <description>Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose either the NAV or DCF method for valuing unquoted equity shares. Where the NAV method is selected and the audited-financial-statement computation is not disputed, income-tax authorities may scrutinise the valuation only within that method and cannot substitute another approach; a share-premium addition based on rejecting the NAV valuation is therefore unsustainable. Income-tax authorities cannot sustain such an addition by determining alleged FEMA contraventions, particularly where no competent FEMA authority has alleged a violation. A right-share issue is not a colourable device without a demonstrated tax benefit or unaccounted-money element. The share-premium addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>