Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.