Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
