Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment of integrated tax paid under the wrong head against intra-State tax liability requires Section 77(2) to be read with Rule 92. Rule 92 contemplates setting off a refund entitlement against an outstanding demand through the prescribed adjustment order. The text states that an undisputed erroneous IGST payment for an intra-State supply should not create tax, interest or penalty liability without considering this adjustment mechanism. It describes the quashing of the adjudication, appellate and demand orders and remand for fresh consideration of adjustment under Section 77(2) and Rule 92.
Adjustment of integrated tax paid under the wrong head against intra-State tax liability requires Section 77(2) to be read with Rule 92. Rule 92 contemplates setting off a refund entitlement against an outstanding demand through the prescribed adjustment order. The text states that an undisputed erroneous IGST payment for an intra-State supply should not create tax, interest or penalty liability without considering this adjustment mechanism. It describes the quashing of the adjudication, appellate and demand orders and remand for fresh consideration of adjustment under Section 77(2) and Rule 92.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
