Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment of integrated tax paid under the wrong head against intra-State tax liability requires Section 77(2) to be read with Rule 92. Rule 92 contemplates setting off a refund entitlement against an outstanding demand through the prescribed adjustment order. The text states that an undisputed erroneous IGST payment for an intra-State supply should not create tax, interest or penalty liability without considering this adjustment mechanism. It describes the quashing of the adjudication, appellate and demand orders and remand for fresh consideration of adjustment under Section 77(2) and Rule 92.
Adjustment of integrated tax paid under the wrong head against intra-State tax liability requires Section 77(2) to be read with Rule 92. Rule 92 contemplates setting off a refund entitlement against an outstanding demand through the prescribed adjustment order. The text states that an undisputed erroneous IGST payment for an intra-State supply should not create tax, interest or penalty liability without considering this adjustment mechanism. It describes the quashing of the adjudication, appellate and demand orders and remand for fresh consideration of adjustment under Section 77(2) and Rule 92.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
