Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Uploading the show-cause notice only under the GST portal's 'Additional notice and orders' tab prevented a reply and violated natural justice. The HC also identified a material mismatch between the financial year covered by the appellate order and those in recovery and garnishee proceedings. It set aside the time-bar dismissal, quashed the appellate order, and required the GST appeal to be entertained and decided on merits, with all merits left open. The delay explanation was to be considered sufficient by the appellate authority, and no further pre-deposit was required. The recovery-related discrepancy warranted a further opportunity to the taxpayer.
Uploading the show-cause notice only under the GST portal's 'Additional notice and orders' tab prevented a reply and violated natural justice. The HC also identified a material mismatch between the financial year covered by the appellate order and those in recovery and garnishee proceedings. It set aside the time-bar dismissal, quashed the appellate order, and required the GST appeal to be entertained and decided on merits, with all merits left open. The delay explanation was to be considered sufficient by the appellate authority, and no further pre-deposit was required. The recovery-related discrepancy warranted a further opportunity to the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
