Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Uploading the show-cause notice only under the GST portal's 'Additional notice and orders' tab prevented a reply and violated natural justice. The HC also identified a material mismatch between the financial year covered by the appellate order and those in recovery and garnishee proceedings. It set aside the time-bar dismissal, quashed the appellate order, and required the GST appeal to be entertained and decided on merits, with all merits left open. The delay explanation was to be considered sufficient by the appellate authority, and no further pre-deposit was required. The recovery-related discrepancy warranted a further opportunity to the taxpayer.
Uploading the show-cause notice only under the GST portal's 'Additional notice and orders' tab prevented a reply and violated natural justice. The HC also identified a material mismatch between the financial year covered by the appellate order and those in recovery and garnishee proceedings. It set aside the time-bar dismissal, quashed the appellate order, and required the GST appeal to be entertained and decided on merits, with all merits left open. The delay explanation was to be considered sufficient by the appellate authority, and no further pre-deposit was required. The recovery-related discrepancy warranted a further opportunity to the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
