Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
