Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.