Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Refund of part of CSR funds by a charitable trust to its donor is examined under the prohibition on applying income or property for the benefit of specified persons. The material states that charitable exemption was not denied because there was no evidence that the donor obtained a benefit from the refund, and the amount was immediately passed to another charitable organisation conducting rural education programmes. It presents the principle that a refund, without donor benefit and followed by charitable application through another organisation, need not constitute prohibited benefit to a specified person.
Refund of part of CSR funds by a charitable trust to its donor is examined under the prohibition on applying income or property for the benefit of specified persons. The material states that charitable exemption was not denied because there was no evidence that the donor obtained a benefit from the refund, and the amount was immediately passed to another charitable organisation conducting rural education programmes. It presents the principle that a refund, without donor benefit and followed by charitable application through another organisation, need not constitute prohibited benefit to a specified person.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.