Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
Bad-debt deduction after 1 April 1989 requires write-off in the accounts and satisfaction of the condition that the debt was considered in computing income; actual irrecoverability need not be established. The notes state that revision under section 263 is impermissible where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the claim and supporting evidence. They also explain that reconciled contract receipts cannot be treated as understated merely because bank credits include mobilisation, material or other non-revenue advances. A reasoned assessment order is not required where documentary replies have been examined and accepted.
Bad-debt deduction after 1 April 1989 requires write-off in the accounts and satisfaction of the condition that the debt was considered in computing income; actual irrecoverability need not be established. The notes state that revision under section 263 is impermissible where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the claim and supporting evidence. They also explain that reconciled contract receipts cannot be treated as understated merely because bank credits include mobilisation, material or other non-revenue advances. A reasoned assessment order is not required where documentary replies have been examined and accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.