Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bad-debt deduction after 1 April 1989 requires write-off in the accounts and satisfaction of the condition that the debt was considered in computing income; actual irrecoverability need not be established. The notes state that revision under section 263 is impermissible where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the claim and supporting evidence. They also explain that reconciled contract receipts cannot be treated as understated merely because bank credits include mobilisation, material or other non-revenue advances. A reasoned assessment order is not required where documentary replies have been examined and accepted.
Bad-debt deduction after 1 April 1989 requires write-off in the accounts and satisfaction of the condition that the debt was considered in computing income; actual irrecoverability need not be established. The notes state that revision under section 263 is impermissible where the assessment record shows that the Assessing Officer examined the claim and supporting evidence. They also explain that reconciled contract receipts cannot be treated as understated merely because bank credits include mobilisation, material or other non-revenue advances. A reasoned assessment order is not required where documentary replies have been examined and accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.