Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.