Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
