Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Derivative option losses claimed through a recognised exchange and registered broker require independent proof of genuineness where investigation material indicates manipulated transactions. Contract notes and banking-channel payments alone were insufficient in light of broker admissions, options acquired shortly before expiry and allowed to lapse, and repeated losses; the taxpayer did not rebut this material, so the loss disallowance was sustained. Jurisdictional objections to reassessment, raised specifically before the Tribunal and requiring factual verification, were admitted but remanded to the appellate authority for detailed adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
