Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement "not known" is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement "not known" is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.