<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Statutory demand notice must exclude stale or prematurely presented cheques and require valid service for cheque dishonour prosecution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101785</link>
    <description>A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement &quot;not known&quot; is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Statutory demand notice must exclude stale or prematurely presented cheques and require valid service for cheque dishonour prosecution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101785</link>
      <description>A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement &quot;not known&quot; is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>