Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement "not known" is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
A statutory demand notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must precisely state the amount due under validly dishonoured cheques. The text notes that a cheque presented after its validity expires, or a post-dated cheque presented prematurely, cannot support prosecution; combining their amounts with valid cheques in one demand renders the composite notice invalid. It also states that a notice returned with the postal endorsement "not known" is not good service unless appropriate further service steps are taken. On these grounds, the appellate acquittal under section 138 was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
