Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Advance rulings bind only the applicant and the concerned or jurisdictional tax officer; third parties cannot claim their benefit or challenge them. A recipient contractually required to reimburse applicable GST lacked locus standi to challenge a supplier's advance ruling because the contract did not fix the supply classification or GST rate. "Applicable GST" meant tax determined under law, and the ruling did not alter any contractual tax treatment. As the recipient was neither the applicant nor a concerned authority, it was not an aggrieved person and its writ petition was not maintainable.
Advance rulings bind only the applicant and the concerned or jurisdictional tax officer; third parties cannot claim their benefit or challenge them. A recipient contractually required to reimburse applicable GST lacked locus standi to challenge a supplier's advance ruling because the contract did not fix the supply classification or GST rate. "Applicable GST" meant tax determined under law, and the ruling did not alter any contractual tax treatment. As the recipient was neither the applicant nor a concerned authority, it was not an aggrieved person and its writ petition was not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
