<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Binding effect of advance rulings excludes supply recipients, leaving contractual GST reimbursement insufficient to establish writ standing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101781</link>
    <description>Advance rulings bind only the applicant and the concerned or jurisdictional tax officer; third parties cannot claim their benefit or challenge them. A recipient contractually required to reimburse applicable GST lacked locus standi to challenge a supplier&#039;s advance ruling because the contract did not fix the supply classification or GST rate. &quot;Applicable GST&quot; meant tax determined under law, and the ruling did not alter any contractual tax treatment. As the recipient was neither the applicant nor a concerned authority, it was not an aggrieved person and its writ petition was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Binding effect of advance rulings excludes supply recipients, leaving contractual GST reimbursement insufficient to establish writ standing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101781</link>
      <description>Advance rulings bind only the applicant and the concerned or jurisdictional tax officer; third parties cannot claim their benefit or challenge them. A recipient contractually required to reimburse applicable GST lacked locus standi to challenge a supplier&#039;s advance ruling because the contract did not fix the supply classification or GST rate. &quot;Applicable GST&quot; meant tax determined under law, and the ruling did not alter any contractual tax treatment. As the recipient was neither the applicant nor a concerned authority, it was not an aggrieved person and its writ petition was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>