Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Excess input tax credit claimed in GSTR-3B beyond the credit reflected in GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B was treated as warranting restriction of credit, statutory interest, penalty and invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The notes state that payment of the admitted tax liability without interest and penalty did not preclude these consequences. For the turnover discrepancy between GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, an explanation based on VAT and Karnataka GST sales required supporting particulars and returns. That limited mismatch issue was remitted for fresh determination upon submission of a proper reply and supporting documents, while the assessment concerning excess credit was sustained.
Excess input tax credit claimed in GSTR-3B beyond the credit reflected in GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B was treated as warranting restriction of credit, statutory interest, penalty and invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The notes state that payment of the admitted tax liability without interest and penalty did not preclude these consequences. For the turnover discrepancy between GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, an explanation based on VAT and Karnataka GST sales required supporting particulars and returns. That limited mismatch issue was remitted for fresh determination upon submission of a proper reply and supporting documents, while the assessment concerning excess credit was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
