<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excess input tax credit beyond reflected supplier data attracts extended-period assessment, interest and penalty; turnover mismatch requires documentary support.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101777</link>
    <description>Excess input tax credit claimed in GSTR-3B beyond the credit reflected in GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B was treated as warranting restriction of credit, statutory interest, penalty and invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The notes state that payment of the admitted tax liability without interest and penalty did not preclude these consequences. For the turnover discrepancy between GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, an explanation based on VAT and Karnataka GST sales required supporting particulars and returns. That limited mismatch issue was remitted for fresh determination upon submission of a proper reply and supporting documents, while the assessment concerning excess credit was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excess input tax credit beyond reflected supplier data attracts extended-period assessment, interest and penalty; turnover mismatch requires documentary support.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101777</link>
      <description>Excess input tax credit claimed in GSTR-3B beyond the credit reflected in GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B was treated as warranting restriction of credit, statutory interest, penalty and invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The notes state that payment of the admitted tax liability without interest and penalty did not preclude these consequences. For the turnover discrepancy between GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, an explanation based on VAT and Karnataka GST sales required supporting particulars and returns. That limited mismatch issue was remitted for fresh determination upon submission of a proper reply and supporting documents, while the assessment concerning excess credit was sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>