Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and related show-cause notice.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires a properly constituted Disciplinary Committee and compliance with the statutory inspection or investigation process. The text explains that the Chairperson is distinct from a whole-time Board member and cannot personally exercise powers delegated to the Disciplinary Committee; a cancellation order issued in that capacity is void for lack of jurisdiction. It further states that adverse appellate tribunal observations cannot replace an independent inspection or investigation, particularly where an earlier inspection found no irregularity. The show-cause notice and cancellation were set aside, while fresh proceedings in accordance with law remained open.
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires a properly constituted Disciplinary Committee and compliance with the statutory inspection or investigation process. The text explains that the Chairperson is distinct from a whole-time Board member and cannot personally exercise powers delegated to the Disciplinary Committee; a cancellation order issued in that capacity is void for lack of jurisdiction. It further states that adverse appellate tribunal observations cannot replace an independent inspection or investigation, particularly where an earlier inspection found no irregularity. The show-cause notice and cancellation were set aside, while fresh proceedings in accordance with law remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.