Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and related show-cause notice.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires a properly constituted Disciplinary Committee and compliance with the statutory inspection or investigation process. The text explains that the Chairperson is distinct from a whole-time Board member and cannot personally exercise powers delegated to the Disciplinary Committee; a cancellation order issued in that capacity is void for lack of jurisdiction. It further states that adverse appellate tribunal observations cannot replace an independent inspection or investigation, particularly where an earlier inspection found no irregularity. The show-cause notice and cancellation were set aside, while fresh proceedings in accordance with law remained open.
Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional requires a properly constituted Disciplinary Committee and compliance with the statutory inspection or investigation process. The text explains that the Chairperson is distinct from a whole-time Board member and cannot personally exercise powers delegated to the Disciplinary Committee; a cancellation order issued in that capacity is void for lack of jurisdiction. It further states that adverse appellate tribunal observations cannot replace an independent inspection or investigation, particularly where an earlier inspection found no irregularity. The show-cause notice and cancellation were set aside, while fresh proceedings in accordance with law remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.