Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Contractual and development rights under a hire-purchase development arrangement may form part of the corporate debtor's insolvency assets even where land title remains with a statutory authority. Such rights are limited to the debtor's existing contractual entitlement and cannot divest third-party ownership, compel land transfer, or bypass statutory requirements for compounding or regularising unauthorised construction. The notes distinguish pre-CIRP sealing and confiscation for unauthorised construction from actions barred by the moratorium, and state that physical possession does not by itself determine land rights. A resolution plan must identify surviving contractual rights, respect third-party title, and address the availability of required statutory approvals.
Contractual and development rights under a hire-purchase development arrangement may form part of the corporate debtor's insolvency assets even where land title remains with a statutory authority. Such rights are limited to the debtor's existing contractual entitlement and cannot divest third-party ownership, compel land transfer, or bypass statutory requirements for compounding or regularising unauthorised construction. The notes distinguish pre-CIRP sealing and confiscation for unauthorised construction from actions barred by the moratorium, and state that physical possession does not by itself determine land rights. A resolution plan must identify surviving contractual rights, respect third-party title, and address the availability of required statutory approvals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.