<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contractual development rights may be insolvency assets, but resolution plans cannot override third-party land title or statutory approvals.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101753</link>
    <description>Contractual and development rights under a hire-purchase development arrangement may form part of the corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency assets even where land title remains with a statutory authority. Such rights are limited to the debtor&#039;s existing contractual entitlement and cannot divest third-party ownership, compel land transfer, or bypass statutory requirements for compounding or regularising unauthorised construction. The notes distinguish pre-CIRP sealing and confiscation for unauthorised construction from actions barred by the moratorium, and state that physical possession does not by itself determine land rights. A resolution plan must identify surviving contractual rights, respect third-party title, and address the availability of required statutory approvals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contractual development rights may be insolvency assets, but resolution plans cannot override third-party land title or statutory approvals.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101753</link>
      <description>Contractual and development rights under a hire-purchase development arrangement may form part of the corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency assets even where land title remains with a statutory authority. Such rights are limited to the debtor&#039;s existing contractual entitlement and cannot divest third-party ownership, compel land transfer, or bypass statutory requirements for compounding or regularising unauthorised construction. The notes distinguish pre-CIRP sealing and confiscation for unauthorised construction from actions barred by the moratorium, and state that physical possession does not by itself determine land rights. A resolution plan must identify surviving contractual rights, respect third-party title, and address the availability of required statutory approvals.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>