Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting of income may be excluded where a bona fide computational error explains the reduction of a returned loss and all material facts were disclosed. The notes describe an inadvertent double deduction of exempt partnership-firm profit in Schedule BP, although the amount had already been disclosed in Schedule EI and reflected in the balance sheet. Acceptance of recomputation, supported by a Chartered Accountant's affidavit, and the absence of proof that the explanation was false supported deletion of the penalty. Repetition of the error in a revised return was not, by itself, treated as conclusive evidence of misreporting or inaccurate particulars.
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting of income may be excluded where a bona fide computational error explains the reduction of a returned loss and all material facts were disclosed. The notes describe an inadvertent double deduction of exempt partnership-firm profit in Schedule BP, although the amount had already been disclosed in Schedule EI and reflected in the balance sheet. Acceptance of recomputation, supported by a Chartered Accountant's affidavit, and the absence of proof that the explanation was false supported deletion of the penalty. Repetition of the error in a revised return was not, by itself, treated as conclusive evidence of misreporting or inaccurate particulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.