<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bona fide computational errors with full disclosure may exclude section 270A penalty, even where returned loss is reduced.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101724</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting of income may be excluded where a bona fide computational error explains the reduction of a returned loss and all material facts were disclosed. The notes describe an inadvertent double deduction of exempt partnership-firm profit in Schedule BP, although the amount had already been disclosed in Schedule EI and reflected in the balance sheet. Acceptance of recomputation, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s affidavit, and the absence of proof that the explanation was false supported deletion of the penalty. Repetition of the error in a revised return was not, by itself, treated as conclusive evidence of misreporting or inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bona fide computational errors with full disclosure may exclude section 270A penalty, even where returned loss is reduced.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101724</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting of income may be excluded where a bona fide computational error explains the reduction of a returned loss and all material facts were disclosed. The notes describe an inadvertent double deduction of exempt partnership-firm profit in Schedule BP, although the amount had already been disclosed in Schedule EI and reflected in the balance sheet. Acceptance of recomputation, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s affidavit, and the absence of proof that the explanation was false supported deletion of the penalty. Repetition of the error in a revised return was not, by itself, treated as conclusive evidence of misreporting or inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>