Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
