Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
