Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Capital gains on transfer of TDR/FSI credit may not arise where the applicable law provides no ascertainable cost of acquisition and the computation mechanism therefore fails. The charging and computation provisions operate as an integrated code, consistent with the principle in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty. TDR/DRC granted under development regulations in lieu of compensation was treated as a statutory entitlement acquired without monetary expenditure, whose value remained indeterminate until utilisation. The pre-amendment deeming provision did not cover such rights, while the later inclusion of other intangible assets and rights applied only from A.Y. 2024-25 and could not retrospectively cure the gap. The land and TDR were distinct assets, so the land's value could not be treated as the TDR's cost. The reported additions for A.Y. 2016-17 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
