Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Method
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged by State Electricity Boards to industrial consumers, rather than rates charged by generating companies to distribution entities; the consumer tariff reflects market value and arm's length price under the applicable provisions. Transfers of steam by eligible units may qualify for deduction where supported by consistent prior treatment. Common expenses may be allocated to eligible units only where they directly relate to those units, with specified expenses allocated on a manpower basis rather than turnover, requiring recomputation. For effluent treatment plants, an authentic third-party quotation may be used under the Other Method without requiring multiple quotations; the related adjustment is therefore not sustainable. The appeal was partly allowed.
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged by State Electricity Boards to industrial consumers, rather than rates charged by generating companies to distribution entities; the consumer tariff reflects market value and arm's length price under the applicable provisions. Transfers of steam by eligible units may qualify for deduction where supported by consistent prior treatment. Common expenses may be allocated to eligible units only where they directly relate to those units, with specified expenses allocated on a manpower basis rather than turnover, requiring recomputation. For effluent treatment plants, an authentic third-party quotation may be used under the Other Method without requiring multiple quotations; the related adjustment is therefore not sustainable. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
