Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Method
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged by State Electricity Boards to industrial consumers, rather than rates charged by generating companies to distribution entities; the consumer tariff reflects market value and arm's length price under the applicable provisions. Transfers of steam by eligible units may qualify for deduction where supported by consistent prior treatment. Common expenses may be allocated to eligible units only where they directly relate to those units, with specified expenses allocated on a manpower basis rather than turnover, requiring recomputation. For effluent treatment plants, an authentic third-party quotation may be used under the Other Method without requiring multiple quotations; the related adjustment is therefore not sustainable. The appeal was partly allowed.
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged by State Electricity Boards to industrial consumers, rather than rates charged by generating companies to distribution entities; the consumer tariff reflects market value and arm's length price under the applicable provisions. Transfers of steam by eligible units may qualify for deduction where supported by consistent prior treatment. Common expenses may be allocated to eligible units only where they directly relate to those units, with specified expenses allocated on a manpower basis rather than turnover, requiring recomputation. For effluent treatment plants, an authentic third-party quotation may be used under the Other Method without requiring multiple quotations; the related adjustment is therefore not sustainable. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.