Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.