Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
