Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Compliance with Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C is mandatory when issuing the final assessment order. The text explains that where the Transfer Pricing Officer has given effect to those directions within the applicable limitation period, the Assessing Officer cannot issue a final order repeating the draft assessment position without incorporating them. A corrigendum issued after limitation cannot retrospectively cure that statutory defect or supply required findings, and is beyond jurisdiction. The described Tribunal decision therefore quashed the defective final assessment order, while leaving other grounds open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
