Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
A limitation objection to a demand raised under the extended limitation period must be decided before the matter proceeds on merits where success on limitation could make remand unnecessary. The notes state that the Tribunal had recorded the contention that the demand was time-barred and that extended limitation was unavailable without suppression of facts, but failed to determine it. The matter was therefore sent back to the Tribunal solely to decide limitation, while the remand on merits was maintained subject to the outcome of that determination.
A limitation objection to a demand raised under the extended limitation period must be decided before the matter proceeds on merits where success on limitation could make remand unnecessary. The notes state that the Tribunal had recorded the contention that the demand was time-barred and that extended limitation was unavailable without suppression of facts, but failed to determine it. The matter was therefore sent back to the Tribunal solely to decide limitation, while the remand on merits was maintained subject to the outcome of that determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.