Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A limitation objection to a demand raised under the extended limitation period must be decided before the matter proceeds on merits where success on limitation could make remand unnecessary. The notes state that the Tribunal had recorded the contention that the demand was time-barred and that extended limitation was unavailable without suppression of facts, but failed to determine it. The matter was therefore sent back to the Tribunal solely to decide limitation, while the remand on merits was maintained subject to the outcome of that determination.
A limitation objection to a demand raised under the extended limitation period must be decided before the matter proceeds on merits where success on limitation could make remand unnecessary. The notes state that the Tribunal had recorded the contention that the demand was time-barred and that extended limitation was unavailable without suppression of facts, but failed to determine it. The matter was therefore sent back to the Tribunal solely to decide limitation, while the remand on merits was maintained subject to the outcome of that determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.