Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar's admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent's case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.
Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar's admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent's case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
