<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benami routing of demonetised cash and denial of cross-examination were rejected absent proof of prejudice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101644</link>
    <description>Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar&#039;s admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent&#039;s case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Benami routing of demonetised cash and denial of cross-examination were rejected absent proof of prejudice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101644</link>
      <description>Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar&#039;s admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent&#039;s case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>