Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar's admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent's case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.
Benami routing of demonetised cash through RTGS entries was upheld where the appellant could not show any prior business relationship with the linked firms, and its bullion-sale explanation rested only on self-generated bills and records. The Tribunal treated the bill mismatches, overwriting, immediate post-demonetisation timing, and the alleged benamidar's admission of receiving cash for RTGS entries as corroboration of the respondent's case, and sustained provisional attachment. On natural justice, denial of cross-examination did not vitiate the order because no statement of one intermediary was on record, the alleged benamidar was offered cross-examination but did not appear, and no actual prejudice was shown.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
