Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consideration received for granting development rights under a redevelopment agreement was treated as capital gains because the payment was directly linked to transfer of valuable development rights, which are capital assets; mere retention of rights in the redeveloped premises did not negate the transfer, and the developer's accounting treatment was irrelevant. As the receipt was referable to transfer of a capital asset, it could not be assessed under the residuary head of income. On that basis, the related exemption for investment in REC bonds was allowed, subject to verification of the statutory conditions.
Consideration received for granting development rights under a redevelopment agreement was treated as capital gains because the payment was directly linked to transfer of valuable development rights, which are capital assets; mere retention of rights in the redeveloped premises did not negate the transfer, and the developer's accounting treatment was irrelevant. As the receipt was referable to transfer of a capital asset, it could not be assessed under the residuary head of income. On that basis, the related exemption for investment in REC bonds was allowed, subject to verification of the statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.