Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Consideration received for granting development rights under a redevelopment agreement was treated as capital gains because the payment was directly linked to transfer of valuable development rights, which are capital assets; mere retention of rights in the redeveloped premises did not negate the transfer, and the developer's accounting treatment was irrelevant. As the receipt was referable to transfer of a capital asset, it could not be assessed under the residuary head of income. On that basis, the related exemption for investment in REC bonds was allowed, subject to verification of the statutory conditions.
Consideration received for granting development rights under a redevelopment agreement was treated as capital gains because the payment was directly linked to transfer of valuable development rights, which are capital assets; mere retention of rights in the redeveloped premises did not negate the transfer, and the developer's accounting treatment was irrelevant. As the receipt was referable to transfer of a capital asset, it could not be assessed under the residuary head of income. On that basis, the related exemption for investment in REC bonds was allowed, subject to verification of the statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.