Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment under section 148A requires the AO to verify the information, disclose the material and inquiry results to the assessee, consider the reply, and record a reasoned view before reopening. Where the notice was based on vague Investigation Wing inputs alleging bogus purchases, without identifying the disputed invoices or supplying supporting material, the Tribunal found no independent application of mind and held the reopening bad in law. On the merits, the assessee produced GST returns, bills, e-way bills, lorry receipts, ledger and bank evidence, while corresponding sales were accepted; in the absence of any defect or proof of grey-market sourcing, the addition for unexplained expenditure was deleted.
Reassessment under section 148A requires the AO to verify the information, disclose the material and inquiry results to the assessee, consider the reply, and record a reasoned view before reopening. Where the notice was based on vague Investigation Wing inputs alleging bogus purchases, without identifying the disputed invoices or supplying supporting material, the Tribunal found no independent application of mind and held the reopening bad in law. On the merits, the assessee produced GST returns, bills, e-way bills, lorry receipts, ledger and bank evidence, while corresponding sales were accepted; in the absence of any defect or proof of grey-market sourcing, the addition for unexplained expenditure was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
